Sunk costs could lead to bad
business decisions
Do you think pulling the plug
on a failed contract would be "wasting all the money" your business
has spent to date?
If so, you may be making the
choice based on emotion and "sunk costs." Sunk costs are past
expenses that are irrelevant to current decisions – such as those spent on
non-performing contracts. Why are they irrelevant? Because that money is
already spent and generally cannot be recovered.
While admitting mistakes may be
difficult and ego-bruising, staunching the flow of cash and changing course by
abandoning a failed contract can be a wise decision. That's because the only
relevant costs are those that influence your company's current and future
operations.
For example, say your firm
hires a new sales representative. You spend thousands of dollars sending the
rep to training seminars. You assign mentors who take time from their busy
schedules to provide on-the-job coaching and oversight. But despite your best
efforts, the new hire isn't working out. The rep doesn't fit your firm's
culture, doesn't grasp the company's goals and procedures and doesn't generate
adequate revenues for the business.
As a manager, what should you
do? At some point, you may need to terminate the employee and start over with
someone else. But what about all that time and money you spent on training and
mentoring? Those are sunk costs. Acknowledge that you can't get them back, cut
your losses, and start anew. Throwing good money after bad won't salvage a poor
business investment – or a poor business decision.
No comments:
Post a Comment